Back to all

I signed up for the Unify Challenge on the very last day. Not because I forgot, but because I was afraid. I want to be transparent about that from the start, because I think it is the most honest and revealing detail of this entire experience. If my essay is going to mean anything, it has to start with the truth. The truth is that I logged in and almost did not show up at all. However, because I did, everything changed.
The person I was matched with was Anna, a full-time undergraduate student at Miami Dade College studying pre-medicine with the goal of becoming a nurse. She was born in the Philippines, carries Ecuadorian roots, and was raised in a close-knit family that has held tightly onto their culture even in a city as layered and loud as Miami. She is an Honors student with an Orthodox background, warm and thoughtful, and she listens in a way that makes you feel like what you are saying actually matters. I am a cybersecurity undergrad, Caribbean by heritage, born and raised in Florida, someone who does not practice religion in a traditional sense but who loves this world with everything I have. On the surface, Anna and I had very little in common. Underneath that surface, we were nearly the same person.
What kept me from signing up sooner was one topic. Gun violence. It is the issue I wrestle with most privately, the one I never discuss publicly, and the one that makes me feel most exposed when it comes up. I believe in the constitutional right to bear arms. I also believe, just as deeply, that it is profoundly wrong to harm another person or to treat a fellow human being as a threat. I live in the tension between those two truths and have never quite known what to do with it. This quiet but persistent question kept surfacing: if I do not stand somewhere on this, does that mean something else falls? I was terrified of being judged for not having a textbook answer. So, I prepared. I had research pulled up, websites ready, my credibility armed and waiting. I was not going to have a conversation. I was going to a debate!
I was not ready for Anna. Not because she challenged me, but because she did not need to. Our conversation moved through some of the heaviest topics this country is currently carrying: violence in the world and the senselessness of it, what it means to feel safe when safety looks so different depending on where you were born and how you grew up. The experience of being a woman and the shared instinct to protect other women, the environment, human decency, what it means to leave this world better than you found it. We talked about faith and the absence of it, about culture and family and what gets passed down and what gets left behind. Like I'd thought, we eventually arrived at gun violence…the topic I had been dreading even minutes before, and I watched something remarkable happen. She felt the same way I did. Obviously, not a mirror, but someone standing in the same complicated place, worried about the same unresolved tensions. We did not interrupt each other once. We did not push back for the sake of it. Instead, we listened, we reflected, and we spoke honestly. We went well over an hour and when it ended, it still did not feel like enough.
I do not have the right word for how that conversation felt, and I have been trying to find it ever since. Liberating comes close, but so does “disarming”. What I can say is that I walked in guarded and walked out grateful, and the distance between those two things was entirely because of who Anna is as a human being. There were no moments of tension. There was no performance. There was no winner. What there was, was two young ladies from completely different experiences of the world sitting down together and discovering that when you strip everything else away, the things that matter most to both of us are the same. We want safety. We want dignity. Furthermore, we want a world that is gentle and more just than the one we inherited. We admitted when we did not know enough to have a strong opinion. We agreed to skip over a couple of things where our experiences had not yet led us to. Through all of it, what held the conversation together was something I did not expect to find there: humility. From both of us.
I believe conversations like this can absolutely help reduce the polarization tearing this country apart, but only if people are willing to show up as themselves rather than as a position. The Unify Challenge works because it removes the audience. There are no points to score. It is just two people and a question, and truth between them. What I discovered was not that Anna and I disagreed and found a way through it. What I discovered was that we barely disagreed at all, and that was the real revelation. Two people from different countries, different faiths, different fields of study, raised in different environments, looking at the same horizon and wanting the same things for everyone standing on it. If that is possible between us, it is possible between far more people than anyone is willing to admit.
The most appealing moment of this entire experience was the instant I realized I did not need a single thing I had prepared. All those websites, the quick research, the mental armor, completely unnecessary. What was needed was exactly what I almost talked myself out of bringing: my honest, unfinished, still-figuring-it-out self. That was enough. The most difficult part was not the conversation but the weeks before it. The second-guessing, the delaying, the quiet battle between the part of me that wanted to participate, and the part convinced it wasn’t an assignment meant “for me”. Sitting down with Anna and feeling that nervousness dissolve within the first few minutes was the moment I understood what I had almost let fear cost me. The difficulty was never her. It was simply the story I had been telling myself, and that story was wrong in every way that mattered.
I would recommend the Unify Challenge to every student who has ever hesitated or almost talked themselves out of something worth doing. I would especially recommend it to the ones who sign up on the last day. I needed this experience, this spark. This experience reminded me that courage does not always feel like certainty. Sometimes it looks like showing up anyway, nervous and over-prepared, quietly hoping the person on the other side of the table is going to be kind. Anna was more than kind. We did not solve anything or fix the world. But we left that conversation more whole than we arrived, and in a time when so much feels broken, I think that is worth everything.

Agreement was never the goal. Here's what 3,600 hours of student dialogue across 44 campuses taught us about real conversation.
Democracy, reimagined. 65 random Akronites are solving housing together... no fighting, just shared goals. This is deliberative democracy.
Home is youth opportunity: Dominique Waters shares why stable housing matters—and why Unify Akron’s Civic Assembly gives him hope.